Subject: Action Alert: Opponent's School Ad - from Pride Foundation and Washington United for Marriage
From: Gabi Clayton ~ Safe Schools Coalition <gabi@safeschoolscoalition.org>
Date: 10/30/2012 9:37 AM
To: IMPORTANTNEWS@safeschoolscoalition.org

Dear Safe Schools Coalition Members and Friends:

1)  Action Alert: Opponent's School Ad - from Pride Foundation and Washington United for Marriage
Note: We are sharing this item because we believe that it is an issue Safe Schools Coalition members and friends may be interested in.
If you have opinion about it, please let your voice be heard.

************************************
1)  Action Alert: Opponent's School Ad - from Pride Foundation and Washington United for Marriage

From: Amy White [mailto:Amy@pridefoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:39 PM
To: Zach Silk; Dustin Lambro; Mary Breslauer (mbreslauer@mac.com)
Subject: Opponent's School Ad

Coalition Partners –

Please below a very important message below from Campaign Manager, Zach Silk, regarding our oppositions new ad that just went on air today.

We need your help to get these talking points into the hands of your staff, volunteers, donors and membership networks as soon as possible.

Thank you in advance and please let us know if you have questions.

Amy
___________________________
Amy White  |  Director of Regional Operations and Leadership
Pride Foundation
 |  Building a Foundation for All

--

From: Zach Silk [mailto:zach@washingtonunited.org]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Opponent's School Ad

TO: Allies
FR: Zach Silk, Campaign Manager

We knew it was coming, and this morning our opponents went up on the air with a TV ad buy they're calling "Schools Could Teach".  This is an old but effective approach: linking marriage for same-sex couples to our kids and schools.  They're using the same Massachusetts couple they've trotted out since 2008, David and Tonia Parker, whose claims have been rejected repeatedly by third-party sources and the courts. 

Because we always anticipated a "schools" attack, we were ready.  We are changing our ad traffic immediately.  We know that the best way to combat this line of attack is reminding parents that values are taught at home and allowing marriage for same sex-couples doesn't change that.  You can see our new ad on our website today: http://youtu.be/56wCkj6UKl8

We also immediately unleashed a fact-based push back in a release to the media and in a memo.  You can find all of that below.  And you can always stay up to date with our fact checking by visiting on http://marriagefactcheck.com/ .

 To help you address any questions, we've supplied a backgrounder on the Parker case and suggested Talking Points. 

Opponents' "Schools" Ad Talking Points

BACKGROUND:
TALKING POINTS: --

For Immediate Release: October 29, 2012
Contact: Andy Grow: 206-713-1792; andy@washingtonunited.org

Washington United for Marriage: New "Schools" Ad by Opponents on R74 Is "Dead Wrong, Outdated" and Recycled from other Marriage States

In a memo sent statewide to media and other interested parties, Zach Silk, the campaign manager for Washington United for Marriage (WUM), the broad coalition working to defend the state's marriage law, lambasted opponent's latest TV ad as "outdated" and "dead wrong."

The ad, entitled "Schools," tells a seven-year-old story of David and Tonia Parker who sued the Lexington, MA, public schools for sending home in its "diversity book bag" a book called "Who's in A Family" that shows pictures of families, including one of a lesbian couple and their children washing the family dog. 

Tired of opponents' unrelenting distortions and false claims from door hangers to online videos, to TV ads, Silk's memo outlines, with citations, the multiple misrepresentations in an ad opponents are running nationally. The memo follows this release.
 
Finally, in the campaign's ongoing effort to inform media and voters about the continual distortions that have marked R74 opponents' public documents, advertising and comments, WUM released yet another marriagefactcheck.com on the "Schools" ad:

FACT CHECK: PMW’s New TV Ad, “Schools” – 10/29/12

Script
NARRATOR: If gay marriage happens here, schools could teach that boys can marry boys.

Fact Check
The marriage equality law passed in Washington has nothing to do with curriculum taught in schools.  The text of the legislation can be found here – it makes no mention of schools or curriculum.

Script
DAVID PARKER: After Massachusetts redefined marriage, local schools taught it to children in second grade, including the school our son attended.

Fact Check


In 2004, gay and lesbian couples were granted the freedom to marry in Massachusetts as a result of a state Supreme Court decision. This decision had no effect on educational standards or other instructions to schools. 

State educational policy on families was established five years earlier, long before marriage was legalized for same-sex couples in the state. In 1999, Massachusetts developed a new Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework that read, “Students will gain knowledge about the significance of the family on individuals and society.” 

As the US Court of Appeals First District summarized: “In January 2005, when Jacob Parker (‘Jacob’) was in kindergarten, he brought home a ‘Diversity Book Bag.’ This included a picture book, Who's in a Family?, which depicted different families, including single-parent families, an extended family, interracial families, animal families, a family without children, and -- to the concern of the Parkers -- a family with two dads and a family with two moms. The book concludes by answering the question, ‘Who's in a family?’: ‘The people who love you the most!’  The book says nothing about marriage.”

Script
Courts ruled parents had no right to take their children out of class or to even be informed when this instruction was going to take place.
Fact Check

As a US Court of Appeals ruled: “Massachusetts does have a statute that requires parents be given notice and the opportunity to exempt their children from curriculum which primarily involves human sexual education or human sexuality issues. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 71, § 32A. The school system has declined to apply this statutory exemption to these plaintiffs on the basis that the materials do not primarily involve human sexual education or human sexuality issues.”

The Boston Globe reported that parents in the Parkers’ school did get notification: “Rachel Cortez, president of the school’s parent-teacher association, said … parents are given a chance to examine the books during a back-to-school night event early in the school year.”
Script
TONIA PARKER: If marriage is redefined in Washington, same sex marriage could be taught in local schools, just as it was in Massachusetts.

Don't make the same mistake and think that gay marriage won't affect you.
Fact Check
The marriage equality law passed in Washington has nothing to do with curriculum taught in schools.  As noted above, the curriculum taught in Massachusetts Public Schools was completely unrelated to the court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage.
-----------------------------------

TO: Washington Media
FROM: Zach Silk, Campaign Manager for Washington United for Marriage
DT: Oct. 29, 2012
RE: PMW’s “Schools” Ad: Proven False Over and Over Again

A new ad launched today by Preserve Marriage Washington (PMW) entitled “Schools” tells a story that is not only outdated, it’s dead wrong. In fact, even the book shown in the ad, “King & King,” is not the book involved in David and Tonia Parker’s complaint.  The book in their son’s diversity book bag, which was at the center of their dispute with the Lexington, MA school system, was actually called “Who’s in A Family?

 

The case presented by the Parkers has been fact-checked and labeled “misleading” and “false” by respected media outlets [more here]. There are no new details in today’s ad to refute those determinations. In fact, it is telling that PMW does not have a more recent example than this fully discredited, seven-year-old claim – one that the United States Supreme Court refused to hear. Washingtonians deserve a more honest conversation about Referendum 74 and the freedom to marry. 

 

Here are the facts about the Parkers’ claim that “When Massachusetts redefined marriage, schools taught it to children in second grade, including the school our son attended.”

 

In 2004, gay and lesbian couples were granted the freedom to marry in Massachusetts as a result of a state Supreme Court decision. This decision had no effect on educational standards or other instructions to schools. 

 

State educational policy on families was established five years earlier, long before marriage was legalized for same-sex couples in the state. In 1999, Massachusetts developed a new Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework that read, “Students will gain knowledge about the significance of the family on individuals and society.” 

 

State law already protects parental rights with regard to teaching values at home. In 1996, the Massachusetts legislature adopted a parental notification statute to be implemented by schools starting with the 1997-1998 school year. This law requires districts to provide parents with notice of and an opportunity to exempt their children from "curriculum which primarily involves human sexual education or human sexuality issues."

 

In January of 2005, the Parker’s son was sent home from school with a “diversity book bag.” In that bag was a picture book called “Who’s in a family?” which depicted different kinds of families and stated, "Who's in a family?" "The people who love you the most!"  The book says nothing about marriage.

 

The school district did not apply the parental notification and exemption statute in this situation, as the U.S. Court of Appeals wrote: “on the basis that the materials do not primarily involve human sexual education or human sexuality issues.” (pp 3-4)

 

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education told Politifact that the state does not mandate a curriculum on same-sex marriage in kindergarten. A spokesman said,"Massachusetts does not require that students in any grade be taught about gay marriage."  Politifact rated the story from the claims about this incident to be false.  

 

This ad is not new.  Not only was this the basis for a TV ad used in California to pass Proposition 8 in 2008, this exact same ad is on the air in three other states facing questions about same-sex marriage this November: Minnesota, Maine, and Maryland.

 

In Minnesota, CBS News Minnesota pointed out that the overall premise of the ad is false. In a fact check of this claim, CBS wrote: “There’s no evidence that Massachusetts ‘teaches’ gay marriage or that young children are being indoctrinated, as the Parkers alleged.  Massachusetts schools do have a diversity curriculum, called the Massachusetts Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework, that includes same-sex marriage; but it was developed before gay marriage was legal.”

 

This is not the first time the Parkers have appeared on camera here in Washington.  In a five-minute video produced by the DC-based Family Research Council and on PMW’s website for the last week, the Parkers told their story in a more elongated form.  You can see our MarriageFactCheck takedown of their story here.  

 

Finally, the premise of the ad is entirely false: that, somehow, our marriage law and R74 has something to do with K-12 curriculum in Washington state.  The body of law that deals with curriculum is a completely separate body of law from either family law or marriage law.  Not only is there not a direct line, there isn't even a dotted line.  

 

WA media – and voters – should know that this is not only a recycled argument, it’s one that’s repeatedly been found to be false and misleading.  It’s designed for one purpose only – to scare and confuse voters and I urge you to do your own independent fact check.  I am sure you will find what every other reputable independent outlet has found – that the “Schools” ad raises hysteria that simply bears no relationship to the facts, and has absolutely nothing to do with Referendum 74 and our bipartisan marriage law.

 

PDF SOURCES/LINKS:

 

Massachusetts Comprehensive Health Curriculum Framework

http://www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/health/1999/1099.pdf

 

“Diversity Book Bag”

http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/07-1528-01A.pdf

 

U.S. Court of Appeals

http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/07-1528-01A.pdf

###

--
Zach Silk
Washington United for Marriage
c: 206.351.6437

************************************

qqqqqqqqqq

DONATE TO THE SAFE SCHOOLS COALITION:

Click here to make a donation online

Or mail this
form with your check made to "Safe Schools Coalition":

Safe Schools Coalition
c/o Rosehedge
1401 East Jefferson Street, Suite 401
Seattle, WA 98122

- - - - - - - - - -

About this Listserv


To SUBSCRIBE to the Safe Schools Coalition's IMPORTANTNEWS List, which averages 2 messages/week including only: urgent messages, action items, SSC meeting minutes


To SUBSCRIBE to the Safe Schools Coalition's NEWS List, which averages 2 messages/day including THOSE SAME THINGS plus: events (conferences, courses, rallies, TV specials, activism opportunities) , resources (books, DVDs, scholarships, curricula, and more), jobs and volunteer and internship opportunities, news digests, opinion digests.

 

To UNSUBSCRIBE or
To SWITCH LISTS (from NEWS to IMPORTANT NEWS or vice versa) or
To CHANGE YOUR ADDRESS, if you are already a subscriber,
GO TO http://www.safeschoolscoalition.org/listsub.asp

************************************

The Safe Schools Coalition is a public-private partnership of 60+ organizations (government agencies, schools, community agencies, churches, youth/student groups, gay/lesbian groups, human rights groups) and 100+ individuals working to help schools become safe places where every family can belong, where every educator can teach, and where every child can learn, regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation.

Safe Schools' website:
http://www.safeschoolscoalition.org
Safe Schools' blog: http://safeschoolscoalition.blogspot.com/
Join SSC's group on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=43732067796
Join SSC's group on LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1110307
Follow SSC on Twitter: http://twitter.com/safeschoolsc
 
Got a problem at school with anti-gay harassment?

In Washington State:

1-877-SAFE-SAFE (1-877-723-3723) 24 hours a day - the phone line is answered at the Sexual Assault Hotline and they will have a Safe Schools Coalition Intervention Specialist volunteer get back to you within 24 hours. Or contact us by email (click here: Intervention) http://www.safeschoolscoalition.org/contact/?id=10 and we will respond within 24 hours.

For non-emergencies: 206-451-SAFE (7233).

Or email us:

Questions
Speakers Bureau
Membership
Publications
Listserv
Website

Co-Chairs:

Beth Reis, Public Health - Seattle & King County, 206-263-8297 NEW
Michelle Munro, not representing a member org
Mo Lewis, King County Sexual Assault Resource Center
Matthew Wilson, Oasis/Pierce County AIDS Foundation

Co-Secretaries:

Heather Carter, Youth Suicide Prevention Program
Frank Couch, Science & Management of Addictions Foundation
Penny Palmer, not representing a member org

Listserv Managers:

Beth Reis for Action Items, Resource messages (books, films, curricula, etc.), Professional Journal messages and Help Needed by Reporters/Authors, Researchers, and Member Organizations
Corey Bernstein and Robyn Walters for News messages
Nik Donia for Event messages
Open position for Jobs, Internships, and Volunteer Opportunity messages
Ryan Schwartz for Right Wing Watch messages
Julie Parmenter for Opinion (blogs, editorials, letters to the editor) messages
Colleen Mullins for Lesson Planning Guide messages
Gabi Clayton for Legislative/Elective messages and Fundraising* messages
    * Note: Fundraising messages are only sent for member organizations.

Send Events to be Posted on the Safe Schools Coalition Calendar!

Buy cool Safe Schools Coalition T-Shirts & Gear

This message has been distributed as a free, non-profit informational service, to members of the Coalition and others who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. Please do not publish or post in a public place on the Internet, copyrighted material without attribution. Forwarding of this material should not necessarily be construed as an endorsement of the content.